Tyler Jewell, CEO of Codenvy, recently received 9 million new reasons to believe in the browser-based Java IDE. Codenvy began as a side project for enterprise social Web framework eXo Platform, but in early March, Codenvy launched a beta for developers to try out around the world.
Jewell is no stranger to enterprise Java development. His resume includes vice presidencies at Oracle and Quest, and a directorship at BEA Systems. We caught up with him shortly after Codenvy raised its initial US$9 million investment from venture capital firms Toba Capital and Auriga Partners, which clearly also believe in the power of a browser-based IDE.
Jewell preaches Codenvy as a cure for the woes of IDE standardization. Typically, developers installing an IDE must configure their IDE to their liking; add in all the libraries and tools used in the enterprise; and link into the build, test and deploy systems. That takes time, and Jewell sees a Web-based, easily replicable cloud-backed alternative as the solution.
SD Times: What is the grand goal for Codenvy, say, five years from now?
Jewell: We believe that in five years, there is no reason any new development should take place on the desktop. If you think about it, every application that runs and operates on the desktop has already moved to the cloud, with the exception of the developer workbench. The reason is, oftentimes, developers are incredibly particular, and they’ve felt like they needed a specialized environment. But we’re starting to realize that the problems that arise from developers working on the desktop are starting to mount up, and we can eliminate all those problems with a cloud-based development environment.
Codenvy is taking the logical next step by taking the developer workspace and moving it into the cloud, making it scalable, sharable and clone-able. The net effect is that most developers can be more productive, in a number of ways, by developing in the cloud than they could have been on their desktop. We’re already starting to see the transition; our growth is starting to kick in. We just crossed 50,000 users.
It feels like your benefits are similar to GitHub: sharing, cloning and forking in a public way.
The parallels are the same. With GitHub, their focus is around the repository life cycle of that. In our world, the workspace itself is a combination of the editor, the build process (which is a runtime), and a test process (which is also a runtime with access to the files that make up the project). Those files have been checked out into a construction phase. When we say cloning, we’re cloning all those elements, the editor, its configuration and the state of those files.