It’s been a few years since JavaOne felt like a fun, vibrant conference. But this year, thanks to the release of the OpenJDK and Java SE 7, attendees had plenty to talk about and learn at the show.
But Java wasn’t the only focus of this double conference that shuts down large parts of San Francisco for the week. Oracle’s announcements were highly developer related as well. With new databases, new machines, and a reprieve for the death sentence that was expected for SPARC, Oracle OpenWorld and JavaOne were chock full of cool tools.
Oracle has long been the company to which all roads in an enterprise lead. With databases that underpin many of the applications inside Fortune 500 companies, information is just used to living inside Oracle systems. But what’s been happening over the last two years has made that paradigm troublesome for the folks on the cutting edge of analytics. Perhaps the biggest time sink in analytics today revolves around the ingress of information into Hadoop.
With terabytes or even petabytes of unstructured data out there to contend with, just moving the info in an Oracle database into a Hadoop cluster for analysis could take an entire day. What’s the solution? Why, selling an Oracle-branded Hadoop system. Oracle’s retinue of business intelligence analytics will run on these Exalytics machines as well. But the real excitement is that these systems are built for fast data transfers and instant query replies, two things that can cause a lot of pain for Hadoop users. If Oracle can continue to innovate around Exalytics, you can bet it’ll be a very compelling force in the Hadoop world.
The Oracle NoSQL Database
You may better know this particular database by its older names: Berkeley DB or Sleepycat. This XML database has always been, essentially, a key value store. A highly performant key value store.
Oracle’s been quietly selling this in-memory database for years, but only at its conference this week did it categorize the database as a NoSQL. And the company did this very begrudgingly. It would seem that the term “NoSQL” is seen as slightly negative for Oracle, as it has lost some business to the myriad competitors in this new market for highly scalable and fast database alternatives.